The fiercely proud Ferrari tifosi may disagree but the UK has long been closely associated
with the UK. Many of the top teams, from McLaren to Williams, Lotus to Red
Bull, have been based here, and so we have done pretty well in the driving
stakes, too. The problem is, so many of them have been dull as ditchwater. OK,
so it doesn’t help when the modern driver is so rarely seen in public. How can
we mere mortals identify a personality if it’s so carefully concealed? Even
more than the top golfers, tennis stars or footballers, they seem to inhabit a
rarified bubble. Their huge earnings finance a life of superyachts, Monte Carlo
mansions, Isle of Man tax havens and personal private jets and on the few
occasions we do get to see them on the tour, they are mostly swaddled in
sponsors’ overalls and helmets. I have to take the commentator’s word that it
really is Fernando Alonso or Sebastian Vettel beneath all those logos.
The Brits have been a mixed bunch. Nigel Mansell was
notorious for having such a dreary demeanour, and it has been difficult to warm
to the likes of Damon Hill John Watson or current champion, the slick, sharp
but vacuous Lewis Hamilton. At least David Coulthard has proved his personality
pedigree in the commentary box, and Jenson Button displayed some youthful
enthusiasm in his early days. The lad from Frome may have become world champion
but he never quite satisfied the UK media’s craven need for a true blonde
playboy driver.
Johnny Herbert had his moments but none ever lived up to
James Hunt. In the Seventies he went from ‘Hunt the Shunt’ to top of the pile,
while simultaneously living in an even faster lane encompassing a voracious
appetite for booze and women. For all this I confess I couldn’t stand him – or
at least the man sold to us through the TV and Press. I much preferred him as
Murray Walker’s sidekick post-retirement, but I never forgave him for taking
the 1976 title from Niki Lauda, who had been lucky to survive his mid-season
crash let alone be in contention to win the championship.
For some reason, it was the relatively morose Austrian who
captured my imagination. He propelled Ferrari to the title in ’75 and was miles
ahead a year later when his season was sunk by that conflagration at the
Nurburgring. His extraordinary recovery and single-minded determination not to
succumb to his burns, helped Lauda win again in ’77 but the one I remember
most fondly was his comeback success – by just half a point! – in 1984.
From the Seventies to the Nineties there was genuine
competition. In the Eighties, Prost, Piquet, Mansell, Berger, Patrese and
Rosberg were usually in contention but it was Ayrton Senna who stirred the senses
more than any other. I’m not qualified to assess the Brazilian’s technical
ability but, just by watching his car on the track, he seemed to possess the
X-factor, an aura which his main rivals simply didn’t have. That’s what made
his fatal crash in the San Marino GP at the peak of his powers so tough for the
sport to take.
Sebastian Vettel was a breath of fresh air when he burst on
the scene, but when someone is fortunate enough to be at the wheel of an
invincible car, continuous success breeds boredom with the casual spectator,
and – let’s face it - the Brits have never liked Germans. Michael Schumacher
epitomised the xenophobic British view of the ‘arrogant Hun’. For starters, he
had an unfortunate sneer-shaped mouth. But the principal reason for the
antipathy was his sheer brilliance behind the wheel. His five consecutive world
titles with Ferrari between 2000 and 2004 represented an unparallelled period
of dominance. What appealed to me was his ability to win in adverse
circumstances. His first world titles came with unfancied Benetton in the
mid-Nineties then he almost single-handedly restored Ferrari’s faded fortunes, going on to a
further five consecutive titles. Nobody could touch him, especially in the wet,
and with Ferrari’s technical team also rediscovering their mojo, F1 was
becoming a procession for Schumacher et al. Such dominance led to all sorts of
rule changes but in the end, credit where credit’s due. Unlike Barbara, the mother of my ex, Jan, I’m not a globetrotting superfan, but I always admired
Schumacher more than any other since Lauda. The more the UK Press hated him,
the more I liked him.
Maybe his legacy was tarnished by his lucrative return to F1
with Mercedes, after a three-year ‘retirement’. He could no longer work
miracles behind the wheel. Sadly, his fearlessness, skill and ultra-sharp
reactions honed in karts and 200mph cars let him down in a split-second in
2013. Not on the track, but off-piste in the French Alps. For all his millions
in the bank and portfolio of palatial properties (every excursion I take in
Europe seems to take me past one of them), his resulting head injury has left
him unable to walk or talk, probably permanently. A desperately distressing
story.
Of course, F1 is a worldwide sport, funded by global
corporations and broadcasting rights deals, demanding names from Russia, Asia
and the USA to attract TV audiences and sponsors in those lucrative markets.
Yanks, Brazilians, Aussies, Finns and Spaniards have all been in the mix but we
still await the first Muscovite, Chinese or Indian winner. I’m sure it will
come. But first there is a 19 year-old Formula 3 champion called Mick
Schumacher to consider. While his dad languishes in a paralysed body, it would
be wonderful if Schumy Junior could keep the Drivers Championship in the
family. Anyone to end the Hamilton hegemony!.
No comments:
Post a Comment