There is something so fundamental, primitive even, about man
(and then it was only men, of course) seeking to run faster, throw further or
jump higher than anybody else with no financial inducement. How things have
changed. Amateurism did persist until the 1980s, although under-the-table
payments were surely paid to the top athletes for many years. The gruesome
spectre of performance-enhancing drugs showed its ugly face in Seoul then crass
commercialism and vulgar nationalism by NBC spoilt the Atlanta Games of 1996.
At least we could rely on the BBC to be an impeccably impartial host
broadcaster in 2012. Er, no. That was the one disappointment of that wonderful
fortnight, of which more later.
Like their classical Greek counterparts, the modern Olympic
Games have rooted themselves deep in my own psyche. It’s one of the few
sporting occasions which has sustained my considerable interest over fifty
years. It helps having the BBC retain its broadcasting rights free to the
masses but there’s something about the world coming together every four years,
competing in a mix of sports in a kaleidoscope of flags and costumes in and
around one city. I can do without the extravagant opening ceremony but the
lighting of the flame would stir my blood in anticipation of a true festival of
sport. Similarly I would find the extinguishing of said flame a fortnight or so
later as an incredibly moving and emotional image, symbolising far more than
the imminent flights home of a few thousand men and women in tracksuits. It
represented the fact that I’d have to wait four years before I could next enjoy
the Games. Like Misha the Moscow mascot in 1980 I would
unashamedly shed a tear.
The first I remember watching on what must have been blurry
black-and-white television was the Mexico City event in 1968. There was David
Hemery’s 400m hurdles world record, Bob Beamon’s phenomenal long jump, Lilian
Board’s 400m battles with Colette Besson and Chris Finnegan winning a boxing
gold for Britain, and I lapped it up.
It hasn’t all been centred on the fortunes of what is now
branded Team GB. Just as well because, before the modern fetish for lavishly
state-funded Olympic glory-hunting, every British medal was savoured like a cup
of water in the Sahara. In my lifetime, all the way up to Sydney in 2000, we
would reap at best only a handful of golds. While I enjoyed witnessing our star
athletes standing proudly on the podium, the Olympic also provided fleeting
fame for those whose sports were just as obscure as their names. For every Mary
Peters or David Wilkie winning races live on our screens, there would be a clip
of an army officer wielding a skinny sword as part of Modern Pentathlon or
another posh bloke in a red jacket completing a clee-ah rahnd on a horse or
some old boy under a hat firing a rifle, shaking hands with an official and
shuffling off into immortality within the Trap shooting fraternity.
For just a few short weeks, we were whisked away into weird
and wonderful worlds of judo, fencing and archery. Most of them, if you started
devising an Olympic programme from scratch, would never make the cut. Regardless,
I would eagerly and dutifully do my utmost to record all the results in my
increasingly tatty Radio Times pull-out. No reliance on Google searches or
Wikipedia back then! For the 1976 event I even bought a paperback book into
which I’d squeeze their names and nationalities in my finest microscopic
capital letters. Athletics, swimming and boxing were filled pretty
comprehensively while sections for sports such as Wrestling tended to be
riddled with holes. They would probably be dominated by the Soviet Union and
East Germany anyway. No Brits, so zero coverage.
Some little-known sports suddenly became hugely popular in
this country, not necessarily linked to British success. Gymnastics in the
early Seventies may have been the fiefdoms of the Eastern Bloc and, in the
men’s events, Japan but in ’72 Olga Korbut’s sweet smile and mini-pigtails
delighted the nation. In 2016 the sport has been opened up to allow 16 countries
a share of the medals on offer, from the USA and Russia down to Spain and
Switzerland. Even Britain has grabbed some memorable golds. In those dark days
of giant empires and shy impoverished continents, only about 120 countries took
part but that tally has almost doubled. The splintering of the Soviet Union,
opening up of China and the American universities developing talents from
previously little-known African republics and Caribbean islands have all helped
make the Olympics truly global in both participation and opportunities for
bringing home a medal or two.
Politics began to interfere with sometimes deadly
consequences, as in Munich. Grim boycotts cast a dismal shadow over the 1980
and 1984 Games in particular as the Cold War protagonists embarked on
last-ditch displays of willy-waving before Gorbachev’s glasnost and perestroika
hastened what I hope will prove the end of crazy nuclear posturing, Trump and
Putin notwithstanding.
All the while, the sport continued to delight, even of some
of the world’s best were missing from the biggest stage. Professionalism may
have heralded lucrative Diamond Leagues and other world championships but an
Olympic gold remains the pinnacle of sporting achievement. That’s why, in the
past few decades, millionaire golfers and tennis players seem happy to set
aside a few weeks in their money-making schedules to helicopter into the
Olympic village. Some, like Andy Murray or Justin Rose, might even expend
enough energy to actually win. While I welcome the introduction to the Olympic
family sports such as triathlon, BMX, Taekwondo and Beach volleyball, I remain
a sceptic about the fit of long-standing professional favourites. What I will
make of Sport Climbing or Karate at Tokyo next year is anyone’s guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment