I remember once being at the first
day of a Lord’s Test involving England and – I think – the West Indies. The
tiers around me seemed filled by half of London’s market research community and
indeed I was only there at the expense of the BBC, a very rare corporate
‘jolly’. I chatted to a colleague whom I considered a cricket fan. Remarking on
the recent form of maybe Andrew Strauss or Darren Gough for Middlesex and
Yorkshire I was struck by his reply: he had no knowledge of England players’
counties and, worse still, was completely uninterested. Would a football
aficionado at Wembley be similarly ignorant about which clubs Harry Kane or
Marcus Rashford represented in the Premier League?
This response got my hackles up
but, even in the mid-Noughties, the writing had long been on the wall. The
ECB’s central contract system severely weakened the link between England’s
stars and the clubs that developed them into the biggest nations in cricket.
Everything was geared to improving the chances of the national teams in the
Ashes, World Cup or a tin-pot Twenty20 tournament, the counties receiving a few
quid as a grudging compensatory ‘thank you’.
It’s the same with national media.
Whereas in my younger days the centrepiece one-day final in September would
generate genuine headlines, in these Ashes-dominated times any newspaper
article would be relegated to the inside back pages beneath the angling and
netball and – with the exception of Sky Sports - on TV there’d be nothing. I
find that so sad.
For me, the County Championship
remains the epitome of proper cricket. It’s not called ‘first-class’ for
nothing. I’m not convinced about the value of a two-tier league system, though.
If it was designed, like football’s PL, to make the rich richer and poor
poorer, it’s not working. For example, in 2011, Lancashire clinched the title
before spending the next four seasons in yo-yo mode. Despite the presence of
Malan, Morgan, Finn, Robson et al even the rich men of Middlesex now languish
in Division Two, just two years after finishing top of the tree.
Since the early Seventies, no
county has displayed the all-important pennant for more than two consecutive
seasons, although between 1979 and 1987 Essex and Middlesex almost made it a
duopoly. Newcomers Durham were initially whipping boys in the Nineties but in
the Noughties won two crowns on the trot. That made my frustration
at Somerset’s lack of success even more acute. At least we are not alone;
neither Northants and Gloucestershire have so far ended their drought.
Perhaps the two most compelling
Championship chases occurred in 1981 and 2016. In a memorable summer of sport
(and decent weather), while England were winning a memorable Ashes series, Sussex
and Nottinghamshire were involved in a right old ding-dong. In the end, with
Clive Rice and Richard Hadlee in top form, Notts narrowly nicked it. Just a few
years ago, three sides went into the final day with a chance of success. Somerset
had fulfilled their promise inside three days and hoped Middlesex and Yorkshire
drew, a likely result. Then came a Toby Roland-Jones hat-trick and my hopes were dashed
yet again.
The red-ball, white-flannelled game
may be largely off even the Sky Sports
screens but at least it endures in Fantasy Cricket. Two decades ago Dad
and I started participating in the Telegraph’s summer-long sister competition
to its football one, and I have continued, albeit with an occasional hiatus,
ever since. It keeps me grounded in the minutiae of the Championship. Where
once it was necessary to assess the point-scoring potential of the Neil
Lenhams, Adrian Dales or Alan Igglesdens, I now pore over the numbers for the
Benny Howells, Tom Baileys and Billy Godlemans. Their faces may not be familiar
but I have a fair feeling for whether they are good value for their Fantasy
‘price’!
I’ve written already about the role
the John Player League played in the evolution of my relationship with cricket.
With Dad I’d watch BBC2’s coverage on most Sunday afternoons and play in the
garden afterwards. Furthermore it was the opening JPL fixture of the 1975
season which introduced me to the live experience at Chelmsford and the
extraordinary batting of a 23 year-old Viv Richards.
Then there was the excitement of a
knockout competition in the form of the 55-over Benson & Hedges (usually a
July climax) and 60-over Gillette Cups (later the Nat West Trophy). In my mind,
the Gillette final (before packed houses) and the following day’s
Sunday League denouement (for instance, 1989) comprised the most electrifying weekend in the entire sporting calendar. Unlike
the Championship, these benefited from network TV coverage and, for the
decisive overs in the early evenings, healthy audiences way above anything Sky
can generate nowadays in spite of the vast array of cameras and commentators
employed.
The knockouts also offered the
leading Minor Counties like Cornwall or Buckinghamshire and other outfits such
as Scotland and even the Netherlands the opportunity to spring a surprise
against the professionals. These days, the only new names in the domestic
cricket pages of the Guardian or ESPN Cricinfo website are associated with
whatever sponsor-friendly suffix counties adopt for the new T20 Blast campaign.
With Warwickshire ditching the county name in preference for the Birmingham
Bears, I fear the move to a city franchise system is looming ever closer.
That would be a calamity, but
that’s what is earmarked for the forthcoming ‘Hundred’. I’ve not been immune to
the charms of the Blast, even attending in person the 2012 Finals Day in
Cardiff, but surely it’s important to harness the exuberance of short formats
to county cricket rather than divorce the two permanently.
Whether a match lasts four hours or
four days, county games deliver just as much drama, tension and enjoyment as
anything served up by a Test or IPL clash; it’s just that the crowds are
thinner, and TV cameras don’t like empty seats. County cricket has given me so
much pleasure that it merits a much longer life, alongside the bigger bang of
the five-day events. In any case, I don’t think England can manage without it.
No comments:
Post a Comment